HOT on the heels of this investigative journalist’s disturbing report – re supportive proofs linking Islam and the gay agenda - more of the same hyper-sexual militancy keeps rearing its head. How could it not. Endemic.
MIND you, the same cult-like, war-driven “religion” which upholds homosexuality as part of its cultural “normative” behavior, on the other hand, murders those who are “caught in the act”!
ADDING to the sexual component, Islam’s serial rapists absolutely believe it is their jihadi duty to defile (and terrorize) as many “infidel” women (whatever their ages) as they can get their hands on. Literally. The “spoils of war.”
CITATION-WISE, the Koran dictates the following about the infidels:
- Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them (2:191)
- Make war on the infidels living in your neighboorhood (9:123)
- When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them (9:5)
- Kill the Jews and the Christians if they do not convert to Islam or refuse to pay Jizya tax (9:29)
- Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable (3:85)
- The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them (9:30)
- Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticise Islam. (5:33)
- The infidels are unclean; do not let them into a mosque (9:28)
- Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies
(22:19)
- Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them (47:4)
- The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them (8:65)
- Muslims must not take the infidels as friends (3:28)
- Terrorise and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an (8:12)
- Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorise the infidels (8:60)
CONSIDER the above dictates of unremitting hatred for non-Muslims, then place them atop said demonstrative evidence:
EVIDENCE ONE:
HOW many are aware that sexual jihad and slave jihad are Koranic derived?
EVIDENCE TWO:
FATWA ONE: Unmarried girls demanded for battlefield sex!
REGARDLESS, the fact that a small segment of Muslim girls are dragged along the sexual jihad path, others absolutely volunteer to “service” their jihadi brothers. But the bottom line is that said actions satiate their pagan Allah and relieves their brothers of sexual frustration! A two-fer.
(Muslimas giving the one-finger ISIS salute!)
EVIDENCE THREE:
FATWA TWO: The sale of kiddies and wives has been deemed “kosher”!
EVIDENCE FOUR:
MOREOVER, all of the above doesn’t obviate an increasingly impotent response – due to an onslaught of Islamic gang bangs within non-Muslim nations – from western leaders.
HOWEVER, what complicates the issue is two-fold: the driving force(s) to Islam’s sexual crimes are relatively unknown within the west’s non-Muslim population. Exacerbating the explosive situation, they are covered up by complicit leaders. In the main, while most are elected officials, other culprits are non-elected. They hail from various leftist circles; media, academia, legal and diplo arenas and they poison the well. Yet, what’s the upshot?
BASICALLY, in order to maintain the facade that Islam is a “religion of peace”, how would it appear if they out-and-out mentioned that the so-called (enumerable) “Asian” suspects are actually Muslims?
BLOWING the lid…
Alan Bedford, the paper’s author, found that “the overall problem was not grasping the nature of the abuse – the grooming, the ‘pull’ from home, the erosion of consent, the inability to escape and the sheer horror of what the girls were going through – but of seeing it as something done more voluntarily. Something that the girls did as opposed to something done to them.”
He notes that “scores of professionals from numerous disciplines, and tens of organisations or departments […] used language that appeared at least in part to blame victims and see them as adults.”
Education Secretary Nicky Morgan has told MPs that the report made it clear that police and social workers had failed on a number of levels. “[The report] is an indictment of the failure of frontline workers to protect extremely vulnerable young people over a number of years,” she said. “Reading the details of what happened to them has been truly sickening.
“The serious case review makes clear that numerous opportunities to intervene to protect these girls were missed as police and social workers failed to look beyond what they saw as troubled teenagers to the frightened child within. “As a result they failed to act on clear evidence of sexual abuse, to protect girls or even to pass on concerns to a sufficiently senior level.” Morgan added that ministers rejected explanations that child sex abuse was not “widely recognized” at the time.
During the trial of the men at the Old Bailey, the Prosecution described the girls who became their victims as vulnerable children, aged just 11 or 12. “… these men, sometimes acting in groups and at other times separately, actively targeted vulnerable young girls from the age of about the ages of 11 or 12,” the prosecutor told the court.
“There is evidence that the men deliberately targeted children who were out of control. They also targeted children who had been sent to live in care homes for precisely that reason. … The girls who were chosen generally had troubled upbringings and unsettled home lives which made it less likely that anyone would be exercising any normal parental control over them or looking out for them.”
Extraordinarily, the police and social services, who are tasked with safeguarding vulnerable children, deemed the children themselves to be complicit in their own abuse. In one police report, a 13-year-old girl was recorded as having an “age appropriate sexual relationship” with an AsianMuslim man much older than her.
Bedford quotes a police report into the matter as finding that “there appears to have been a tolerance of underage sexual activity and no recognition of factors such as abuse of power and coercion and the fact that this was against the law.
“At interview most members of staff disputed they tolerated underage sex and they did try to talk to the girls about this but that often the most they felt they could do was to stress that it was inappropriate, to ask the girls why they thought older men would be interested in young girls and to talk about safe sex.”
Bedford concludes that “there was, beyond any lack of knowledge or clarity, an acceptance of a degree of underage sexual activity that reflects a wider societal reluctance to consider something ‘wrong’.”
The report includes testimonies from the girls, aged between 12 and 15 at the time of their abuse: “Dad was violent to me. I thought it was normal.” “Suddenly the guys were bringing me stuff. They said how lovely I was.” “They paid for drinks and gave us drugs” “They took us to a field where there were other men who had come to have sex with us. I tried not to do it. There were five of them.” “He urinated on me.” “It was always Muslim men.”
“I was expected to do things – if I didn’t they said they would come to my house and burn me alive. I had a baby brother.” “I turned up at the police station at 2/3am, blood all over me, soaked through my trousers to the crotch. They dismissed it as me being naughty, a nuisance. I was bruised and bloody.” “Social services washed their hands – ‘it’s your choice’ I was told.”
“Police… didn’t find me except once… I didn’t hide – I told people where I was.” “If a perpetrator can spot the vulnerable children, why can’t professionals?”
POINTEDLY, the political leadership’s (the police and social services alike) cycle of silence, coupled with bouts of obfuscation from the media – as to the religious persuasion of the rapists – allows Islam’s sexual predators to continue unimpeded. Not only that, non-Muslims throughout the west are perilously placed at risk due to their malfeasance. Sooner than later, non-Muslims must realize that they are on their own, as officialdom has zero interest to expose the evidence, the dangers, at hand!
{re-blogged at Joe For America}
{re-blogged at Israel’s Voice}
